It makes perfect sense that amongst these different schools, kids come from a certain economical background in which they grow up in relation to their surroundings and parents. The teachers treat these kids with as much mental and physical independence that they believe they can successfully handle in relation to the world they live in outside the school. If students are encouraged to express creativity and free-thought, this would most likely mimic the abilities of people within their social class who use these abilities to go after their dreams and have an enlightened attitude of the world. Whereas students who are taught rote memorization most likely come from a lower social class where the basis of supporting one’s self relies on a job and outlook on life where they are told how to do something and need to memorize and practice until they can repeatedly do it very well. There is no idea of breaking down the barriers to strive for something beyond.
At the conclusion of Anyon’s writing, she states how the differences in schooling help to reproduce the certain systems of relations in society. I had been thinking that that was the purpose of the passage the whole time I was reading it. If a student in the working-class school is growing up in near poverty with parents working full-time minimum wage jobs, possibly without the consistent attention and care of their parents, the teacher caters to that lifestyle by restricting the student to what she thinks is attainable and realistic regarding his upbringing. Thus, he would probably grow up having only the capacities to achieve the same or little more than what his parents were able to. On the other hand, in the executive elite schools, the children are taught with extremely profound thought and awareness from obviously an early age, not just learning but analyzing and applying their knowledge, initiating a path for them to be able to have a superior edge in the working world, just like their parents who expect them to achieve as they have themselves. I think that this is a generally accurate approximation of education’s influence on society, which is why it is so poor in the country right now. There needs to be more balance, with equal opportunity presented to all students regardless of their current economic background.